Canter v. Mulnick
This text of 455 N.E.2d 1257 (Canter v. Mulnick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed with costs.
The Appellate Division correctly held that the plaintiffs’ affidavit failed to establish the merit of their case, and that the motion to dismiss should have been granted unconditionally (see Stolowitz u Mount Sinai Hosp., 60 NY2d 685).
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
455 N.E.2d 1257, 60 N.Y.2d 689, 468 N.Y.S.2d 462, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/canter-v-mulnick-ny-1983.