Ervin Russell Sims v. Dale E. Foltz, Warden

811 F.2d 607, 1986 WL 18499
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedDecember 16, 1986
Docket86-1571
StatusUnpublished

This text of 811 F.2d 607 (Ervin Russell Sims v. Dale E. Foltz, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ervin Russell Sims v. Dale E. Foltz, Warden, 811 F.2d 607, 1986 WL 18499 (6th Cir. 1986).

Opinion

811 F.2d 607

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Ervin Russell SIMS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Dale E. FOLTZ, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 86-1571.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Dec. 16, 1986.

Before JONES and MILBURN, Circuit Judges, and CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

This appeal has been referred to this panel pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Appellant is appealing the June 4, 1986 judgment dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On June 16, he served a motion to vacate judgment requesting the same relief as that in his original petition. Such a motion is properly construed as a motion to alter or amend pursuant to Rule 59(e), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Hull v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 675 F.2d 119 (6th Cir.1982). A timely Rule 59(e) motion tolls the time for filing a notice of appeal. When the motion is disposed of, a new notice of appeal must be filed. Rule 4(a)(4), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Myers v. Ace Hardware, Inc., 777 F.2d 1099 (6th Cir.1985). Appellant's notice of appeal filed on June 18, 1986, before the district court disposed of the motion to vacate judgment, is of no effect. The Court is without jurisdiction to entertain this appeal.

It is ORDERED that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed. Rule 9(d)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Myers v. Ace Hardware, Inc.
777 F.2d 1099 (Sixth Circuit, 1985)
Petz v. Hertzberg
811 F.2d 607 (Sixth Circuit, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
811 F.2d 607, 1986 WL 18499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ervin-russell-sims-v-dale-e-foltz-warden-ca6-1986.