Ernest Peter Thomas v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 12, 2013·No. 01-13-00086-CR·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-13-00086-CR Style: Ernest Peter Thomas v. The State of Texas Date motion filed*: August 20, 2013 Type of motion: Extension of time to file Anders response and motion for new appellate counsel Party filing motion: Pro se Document to be filed: Anders response

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time: Original due date: September 6, 2013 Number of previous extensions granted: 0 Current Due date: September 6, 2013 Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted If document is to be filed, document due: October 7, 2013  Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ Appellant’s motion is granted in part and denied in part. The Court denies appellant’s motion for new appellate counsel. The Court grants appellant’s motion for extension of time and orders appellant’s response be filed no later than October 7, 2013.

Judge's signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes 

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: September 12, 2013

November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ernest Peter Thomas v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Ernest Peter Thomas v. State (Ernest Peter Thomas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.