Ernest Peter Thomas v. State
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION
Cause number: 01-13-00086-CR Style: Ernest Peter Thomas v. The State of Texas Date motion filed*: October 17, 2013 Type of motion: Motion to dismiss second motion for extension of time to file Anders response Party filing motion: Pro se Document to be filed: Anders response
Is appeal accelerated? No
If motion to extend time: Original due date: Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date: Date Requested:
Ordered that motion is:
Granted If document is to be filed, document due: Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other: _____________________________________ On October 8, 2013, appellant filed his second motion for extension of time to file Anders response. The Court granted his motion and set the deadline for appellant’s response for November 21, 2013. Appellant has now filed a motion to dismiss his second motion for extension of time and states that he no longer desires to file an Anders response. The Court grants appellant’s motion to dismiss and strikes its October 8, 2013 order granting appellant’s second motion for extension of time.
Judge's signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes
Panel consists of ____________________________________________
Date: November 7, 2013
November 7, 2008 Revision
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ernest Peter Thomas v. State (Ernest Peter Thomas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.