Ernest D. Grace, and Mobile Chemical Company v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Marie Brown

Fifth Circuit

Ernest D. Grace, and Mobile Chemical Company v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Marie Brown

440 F.2d 411, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10913

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedApril 6, 1971

Docket29989_1

StatusPublished

This text of 440 F.2d 411 (Ernest D. Grace, and Mobile Chemical Company v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Marie Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ernest D. Grace, and Mobile Chemical Company v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Marie Brown, 440 F.2d 411, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10913 (5th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

440 F.2d 411

Ernest D. GRACE, Plaintiff-Appellee, and Mobile Chemical
Company, Plaintiff,
v.
HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY,
Defendant-Appellant, Marie Brown et al., Defendants.

No. 29989.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 6, 1971.

N. Forrest Montet, Atlanta, Ga., Fred D. Bentley, Sr., Marietta, Ga., Candler, Cox, McClain & Anrews, Atlanta, Ga., Odom & Dendy, Millen, Ga., for appellant.

Frank Love, Jr., Randall L. Hughes, Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy, Atlanta, Ga., for appellees, Ernest D. Grace and Mobile Chemical Co.

Hamilton Lokey, Gerald F. Handley, Atlanta, Ga., for appellees, Marie Brown, Charlie O'Kelley and Allan Taylor Plunkett.

Before THORNBERRY and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges, and BOOTLE, District judge.

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed on the opinion of the District Court. 324 F.Supp. 953 (N.D.Ga.1970).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI