Erlwein v. Von Gerichten

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Erlwein v. Von Gerichten

10 A.D.2d 582, 195 N.Y.S.2d 876, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12071

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 25, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 10 A.D.2d 582 (Erlwein v. Von Gerichten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Erlwein v. Von Gerichten, 10 A.D.2d 582, 195 N.Y.S.2d 876, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12071 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to establish the regularity of a tax sale and the title to a parcel of real property resulting therefrom (Nassau County Administrative Code, §§ 5-57.1, 5 — 57.2; L. 1939, ohs. 272, 704), the appeal is from an order of the County Court, Nassau County, denying appellant’s motion for summary judgment striking out respondent’s answer and granting partial summary judgment in favor of respondent and permitting him to redeem. Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. On this record no triable issue is presented either as to respondent’s ownership of the property in question or as to the amount of the redemption figure. Present — Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to establish the regularity of a tax sale and the title to a parcel of real property resulting therefrom (Nassau County Administrative Code, §§ 5-57.1, 5 — 57.2; L. 1939, ohs. 272, 704), the appeal is from an order of the County Court, Nassau County, denying appellant’s motion for summary judgment striking out respondent’s answer and granting partial summary judgment in favor of respondent and permitting him to redeem. Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. On this record no triable issue is presented either as to respondent’s ownership of the property in question or as to the amount of the redemption figure. Present — Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 582, 195 N.Y.S.2d 876, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12071, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erlwein-v-von-gerichten-nyappdiv-1960.