Erlwein v. Von Gerichten

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Erlwein v. Von Gerichten

8 A.D.2d 616, 185 N.Y.S.2d 519, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9321

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 6, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 8 A.D.2d 616 (Erlwein v. Von Gerichten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Erlwein v. Von Gerichten, 8 A.D.2d 616, 185 N.Y.S.2d 519, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9321 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to foreclose tax liens on certain real property, the appeal is from an order denying appellant’s motion to vacate an ex parte order of discontinuance as to specified parcels of said real property. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. (Erlwein v. Von Gerichten, 7 A D 2d 650; Nosrep Corp. v. Clinton Securities Corp., 193 App. Div. 878; [617]*617Chapman v. Wolf, 89 App. Div. 563.) Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to foreclose tax liens on certain real property, the appeal is from an order denying appellant’s motion to vacate an ex parte order of discontinuance as to specified parcels of said real property. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. (Erlwein v. Von Gerichten, 7 A D 2d 650; Nosrep Corp. v. Clinton Securities Corp., 193 App. Div. 878; [617]*617Chapman v. Wolf, 89 App. Div. 563.) Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 A.D.2d 616, 185 N.Y.S.2d 519, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erlwein-v-von-gerichten-nyappdiv-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack