Erler v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Erler v. State

276 So. 2d 498, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6933

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 25, 1973

DocketNo. 72-992

StatusPublished

This text of 276 So. 2d 498 (Erler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Erler v. State, 276 So. 2d 498, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6933 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On the basis of our review of the briefs, record on appeal and oral argument we are of the opinion that the motion for post-conviction relief contains sufficient allegations to entitle appellant to an evidentiary hearing under Rule 3.850, FRCrP., 33 F.S. A. Blackman v. State, Fla.App.1971, 256 So.2d 18. See also Brady v. Maryland, 373 [499]*499U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). Cf. Fast v. State, Fla.App.1969, 221 So.2d 203; Estevez v. State, Fla.App.1968, 206 So.2d 697; Marti v. State, Fla.App.1964, 163 So.2d 506; Estrella v. State, Fla.App.1968, 215 So.2d 489; Sampson v. State, Fla.App.1963, 158 So.2d 771; and Thomas v. State, Fla.App.1968, 210 So.2d 488.

Accordingly, the order appealed from is reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court for the purpose of providing an evidentiary hearing.

OWEN and MAGER, JJ., and MORROW, RUSSELL O., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On the basis of our review of the briefs, record on appeal and oral argument we are of the opinion that the motion for post-conviction relief contains sufficient allegations to entitle appellant to an evidentiary hearing under Rule 3.850, FRCrP., 33 F.S. A. Blackman v. State, Fla.App.1971, 256 So.2d 18. See also Brady v. Maryland, 373 [499]*499U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). Cf. Fast v. State, Fla.App.1969, 221 So.2d 203; Estevez v. State, Fla.App.1968, 206 So.2d 697; Marti v. State, Fla.App.1964, 163 So.2d 506; Estrella v. State, Fla.App.1968, 215 So.2d 489; Sampson v. State, Fla.App.1963, 158 So.2d 771; and Thomas v. State, Fla.App.1968, 210 So.2d 488.

Accordingly, the order appealed from is reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court for the purpose of providing an evidentiary hearing.

OWEN and MAGER, JJ., and MORROW, RUSSELL O., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

276 So. 2d 498, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6933, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erler-v-state-fladistctapp-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack