Blackman v. State
This text of 256 So. 2d 18 (Blackman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On the basis of our review of the briefs, record on appeal and oral argument we are of the opinion that the appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief contains sufficient allegations with respect to an alleged coerced guilty plea to entitle appellant to an evidentiary hearing pursuant to Rule 1.850, F.R.Crim.P., 33 F.S.A. Brumley v. State, Fla.App. 1969, 224 So.2d 447. Appellant’s other contentions are without merit. Accordingly, the order appealed from is re[19]*19versed and the cause remanded to the trial court for the purpose of providing an evi-dentiary hearing solely on the issue of the voluntariness of the guilty plea.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
256 So. 2d 18, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blackman-v-state-fladistctapp-1971.