Erika Aldana De Marquez v. Eric Holder, Jr.

490 F. App'x 922
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 21, 2012·No. 10-71724·Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Erika Aldana de Marquez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, and review de novo questions of law. Rodriguez-Echeverria v. Muka-sey, 534 F.3d 1047, 1050 (9th Cir.2008). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Aldana de Marquez knowingly encouraged and assisted another alien in seeking entry to the United States in violation of law. See 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(E)(i); Altamirano v. Gonzales, 427 F.3d 586, 592 (9th Cir.2005) (requiring an affirmative act of assistance or encouragement in order to establish alien smuggling).

Contrary to Aldana de Marquez’s contention, the agency’s admission of the Form 1-213, Record of Deportable/Inad-missible Alien, was fundamentally fair. See Espinoza v. INS, 45 F.3d 308, 310 (9th *923 Cir.1995) (admission of Form 1-213 is fair absent evidence of coercion or that the statements do not belong to petitioner).

Aldana de Marquez’s claim under 8 C.F.R. § 287.3(c) is unavailing. See Sa-mayoa-Martinez v. Holder, 558 F.3d 897 (9th Cir.2009).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Erika Aldana De Marquez v. Eric Holder, Jr., 490 F. App'x 922 (9th Cir. 2012).

490 F. App'x 922 (Erika Aldana De Marquez v. Eric Holder, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

De Rodriguez-Echeverria v. Mukasey
534 F.3d 1047 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)
Samayoa-Martinez v. Holder
558 F.3d 897 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)