Erie Insurance Exchange v. Weryha

958 A.2d 493, 598 Pa. 536, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 1656

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Erie Insurance Exchange v. Weryha. Read the opinion of the Court — 958 A.2d 493 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 1, 2008·No. Appeal No. 414 WAL 2007·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 1st day of October, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, reframed for purposes of clarity, are:

1. Where divorced or separated parents have joint custody of a child pursuant to an order of court, is that child per se a legal resident in both parents’ households for purposes of the receipt of underinsured motorist benefits pursuant to the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law?

2. Considering the totality of the circumstances, was decedent Timothy Weryha a legal resident of Father’s household for purposes of the receipt of underinsured motorist benefits pursuant to the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 1st day of October, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, reframed for purposes of clarity, are:

1. Where divorced or separated parents have joint custody of a child pursuant to an order of court, is that child per se a legal resident in both parents’ households for purposes of the receipt of underinsured motorist benefits pursuant to the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law?

2. Considering the totality of the circumstances, was decedent Timothy Weryha a legal resident of Father’s household for purposes of the receipt of underinsured motorist benefits pursuant to the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law?

Erie Insurance Exchange v. Weryha, 958 A.2d 493, 598 Pa. 536, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 1656 (Pa. 2008).

Pincite

958 A.2d 493 (Erie Insurance Exchange v. Weryha) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.