Erie Insurance Exchange v. Weryha

958 A.2d 493
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 1, 2008·No. 414 WAL 2007·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 1st day of October, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, reframed for purposes of clarity, are:

1. Where divorced or separated parents have joint custody of a child pursuant to an order of court, is that child per se a legal resident in both parents’ households for purposes of the receipt of underinsured motorist benefits pursuant to the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law?

2. Considering the totality of the circumstances, was decedent Timothy Weryha a legal resident of Father’s household for purposes of the receipt of underinsured motorist benefits pursuant to the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Erie Insurance Exchange v. Weryha, 958 A.2d 493 (Pa. 2008).

958 A.2d 493 (Erie Insurance Exchange v. Weryha) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

M.M. v. Department of Public Welfare
958 A.2d 493 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2008)