Eric Drake v. Chase Bank

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00340-CV

ERIC DRAKE APPELLANT V.

HSBC BANK, CHASE BANK, AND APPELLEES CAPITAL ONE BANK

------------

FROM THE 158TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 2013-20534-158

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

We have considered the parties’ “Agreed Motion For Partial Dismissal Of Appeal.” It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss appellant’s appeal against appellee Capital One Bank only. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), (b), 43.2(f).

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

This case shall hereafter be styled “Eric Drake v. HSBC Bank and Chase Bank.”

The costs incurred by Capital One are taxed against Capital One, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ. DELIVERED: July 3, 2014