Eric Drake v. Chase Bank

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 24, 2014·No. 02-13-00340-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00340-CV

ERIC DRAKE APPELLANT

V.

HSBC BANK AND CHASE BANK APPELLEES

------------

FROM THE 158TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 2013-20534-158

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

We have considered the parties’ “Agreed Motion For Partial Dismissal of

Appeal.” It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we

dismiss the appeal against appellee HSBC Bank only. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.1(a)(2), 43.2(f).

The case shall hereafter be styled “Eric Drake v. Chase Bank.”

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. The costs incurred by HSBC Bank are taxed against HSBC Bank, for

which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

DELIVERED: July 24, 2014

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eric Drake v. Chase Bank, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Eric Drake v. Chase Bank (Eric Drake v. Chase Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.