ERIC DANIEL DIAL v. THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, EX. REL., OLIVIA DIAL

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 29, 2023
DocketA24A0414
StatusPublished

This text of ERIC DANIEL DIAL v. THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, EX. REL., OLIVIA DIAL (ERIC DANIEL DIAL v. THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, EX. REL., OLIVIA DIAL) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
ERIC DANIEL DIAL v. THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, EX. REL., OLIVIA DIAL, (Ga. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ November 29, 2023

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A24A0414. ERIC DANIEL DIAL v. THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, EX. REL., OLIVIA DIAL et al.

In this action for child support, Eric Daniel Dial seeks to appeal the trial court’s final contempt order adjudicating his child support arrearage. We lack jurisdiction because the order at issue is not subject to direct appeal. “Appeals from judgments or orders in divorce, alimony, and other domestic relations cases” must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary review. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2), (b). Because the underlying subject matter is the father’s obligation to provide child support, it is a domestic relations case within the meaning of the statute. See Booker v. Ga. Dept. of Human Resources, 317 Ga. App. 426, 427 (731 SE2d 110) (2012) (an action in which the “underlying subject matter is the obligation to provide child support” is “a domestic relations case subject to review only by application”). Although OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (11) permits a direct appeal from child custody rulings issued in child custody cases, the order at issue in this appeal does not include any child custody rulings, so it does not fall within the scope of this provision. See Voyles v. Voyles, 301 Ga. 44, 47 (799 SE2d 160) (2017). Dial’s failure to follow the discretionary appeal procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 11/29/2023 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Voyles v. Voyles
799 S.E.2d 160 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2017)
Booker v. Georgia Department of Human Resources
731 S.E.2d 110 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
ERIC DANIEL DIAL v. THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, EX. REL., OLIVIA DIAL, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eric-daniel-dial-v-the-georgia-department-of-human-services-ex-rel-gactapp-2023.