Erb v. California

386 U.S. 273, 87 S. Ct. 1034, 18 L. Ed. 2d 41, 1967 U.S. LEXIS 2048
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 13, 1967
Docket23, Misc
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 386 U.S. 273 (Erb v. California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Erb v. California, 386 U.S. 273, 87 S. Ct. 1034, 18 L. Ed. 2d 41, 1967 U.S. LEXIS 2048 (1967).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the casé remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18.

Mr. Justice Stewart would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. White
621 S.W.2d 287 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1981)
State v. Sager
600 S.W.2d 541 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1980)
State v. Morris
564 S.W.2d 303 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1978)
State v. Pitchford
556 S.W.2d 57 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1977)
State v. Madison
557 S.W.2d 8 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1977)
State v. Tettamble
517 S.W.2d 732 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1974)
State v. Tettamble
450 S.W.2d 191 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1970)
People v. Katzman
258 Cal. App. 2d 777 (California Court of Appeal, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
386 U.S. 273, 87 S. Ct. 1034, 18 L. Ed. 2d 41, 1967 U.S. LEXIS 2048, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erb-v-california-scotus-1967.