Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Mid-South Automobile Club

663 F. Supp. 11, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13728, 43 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 37,134, 43 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1861
CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee
DecidedJanuary 14, 1987
DocketNo. 81-2358-W
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 663 F. Supp. 11 (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Mid-South Automobile Club) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Mid-South Automobile Club, 663 F. Supp. 11, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13728, 43 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 37,134, 43 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1861 (W.D. Tenn. 1987).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WELLFORD, Circuit Judge, Sitting by Designation.

This case was heard and considered by the Court sometime ago, and has been regrettably overlooked resulting in a failure promptly to dispose of the issues between the parties in this Title VII dispute. The undersigned Judge apologizes for this oversight. The Court has carefully reviewed its notes, the file, and the pleadings in this cause and now makes the following findings and conclusions based on the proof and evidence:

Plaintiff, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (hereinafter “EEOC”), is the federal agency authorized to bring this suit under the provisions of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. This Court has jurisdiction over this cause.

Defendant, Mid-South Automobile Club (formerly known as Dixie Motor Club) (hereinafter “Mid-South”), has been and is engaged in the business of providing route information, maps, road service, insurance, and other services for the American Automobile Association for travelers in and about Tennessee and adjoining states primarily, but also with respect to providing tour information and obtaining reservations for domestic and foreign travel. Defendant has employed fifteen or more employees in each working day of twenty or more calendar weeks in the preceding years involved. The Memphis office has not employed fifteen or more employees since January, 1973.

A timely charge was filed with the EEOC by Carolyn Vaughn, a black female employee of Mid-South on April 20, 1979, alleging that she had been unlawfully denied a promotion because of her race. Defendant was served with a copy of the charge on or about May 2, 1979.

The EEOC investigated Vaughn’s charge, issued a reasonable cause determination and attempted unsuccessfully to conciliate. EEOC followed the statutory and regulatory requirements in investigation and pursuit of the charge.

Oscar L. King, Jr. became Vice President of the Memphis office of Mid-South upon its acquisition by defendant in January, 1973. At the time of acquisition, the employees of the former Dixie Motor Club were retained as employees of Mid-South.

Vaughn applied for a position as sales representative with Mid-South in 1974. She did so upon recommendation of Mazie Gentry, another black female employed by Mid-South as a sales representative. Vaughn indicated on her application both that she had graduated from high school and that she had completed two years’ college at LeMoyne-Owen College in Memphis. Her application did not indicate particular secretarial skills or ability, familiarity with office machines, or other clerical qualifications. Vaughn was hired and assigned the job of sale representative. She called on the telephone prospective leads for members of Mid-South. If a prospective member indicated a desire to join Mid-South, Vaughn then prepared a membership application and took it to the new member’s home for execution. Vaughn worked at Mid-South’s office on Union Avenue in Memphis, along with other sales representatives, principally between 5:00 p.m. and 9:00 p.m. Her compensation was in the form of commissions; during 1977 she received $5,479.41 and in 1978, $5,397.39 from Mid-South.

In December 1975, it came to the attention of King, defendant’s manager, that Vaughn and another sales representative working at the Mid-South office after 5:00 p.m., were having visitors on the premises. Due to difficulties which arose from having visitors on the premises, in December 1975, King issued a memorandum to all Mid-South employees advising them not to have visitors on the premises after regular hours, or 5:00 p.m.

In 1975, Mid-South closed its domestic travel counselor program in Jackson, Ten[13]*13nessee. A sales representative and local manager, Ray Harris, who had been transferred from Memphis to Jackson, returned to the Memphis office. Upon his return to Memphis, Harris was interviewed by Pamela Jones, domestic travel manager, for a job as domestic travel counselor. Harris was assigned the duty of domestic travel counselor and served as such until August 1981, when he resigned. Vaughn was working as a sales representative at this time, but she did not apply for the position Harris obtained.

In December 1978, Vaughn informed King that she would like to be considered for the next available vacancy as a domestic travel counselor, having learned that there might be an impending vacancy. In February 1979, Vaughn was interviewed for the position by King, who did not then ask her to update her prior application. During the interview, King did not encourage Vaughn to expect that she would be hired in this capacity.1

Telephone inquiries regarding memberships which were received during the regular day office hours, prior to 5:00 p.m., were deemed considered “house accounts” for which sales commissions would not be paid. Sales representatives were instructed not to contact “house accounts” in an effort to sell memberships. Vaughn and the other sales representatives, Grimmer and Karnes, had some disputes about these accounts with worldwide travel counselors, who worked during regular hours generally. Vaughn attempted to pick up leads at the close of the regular workday by observing worldwide and domestic travel counsels’ notes in another area of the office. King considered that Vaughn was attempting to obtain by this means “house accounts” on which defendant did not expect to pay commissions.

On October 1,1978, Sara O’Ryan, a white female who had attended school in France, submitted an application for employment at Mid-South. O’Ryan indicated that she possessed clerical skills including the use of a typewriter, an adding machine, and filing ability. She was the daughter-in-law of the former head of the Dixie Motor Club who became a member of Mid-South’s board of directors upon its acquisition in January 1973. On February 15, 1979, Phylis Floyd Johnson, a black female, also submitted an application for a position with Mid-South. On Johnson’s application she indicated a desired salary of $800 per month, which was considerably higher than what other Mid-South travel counselors were then earning.

Diane Conry, a domestic travel counsel- or, informed King that she was resigning in late February or March of 1979. After Conry’s resignation, King reviewed the applications on file and, after consultation with Pamela Jones, manager of domestic travel, determined to hire O’Ryan, who began work on March 16, 1979, at a salary of $500 per month. Vaughn did not learn of O’Ryan’s selection until a short time after she began work in this position. Vaughn remonstrated with King reminding him that she had on more than one occasion expressed her interest in the job, including a very recent inquiry and application.

There were no particular or exceptional job qualifications for the position of domestic travel counselor. The actual job duties required that a counselor be able to read and comprehend certain reference manuals needed to make road maps, develop maps and give out information on request from source materials. They were also required to operate an adding machine. King expressed a strong desire for subjective criteria of a pleasant personality and an ability to get along well with people.

Vaughn was qualified for a position as domestic travel counselor with some necessary training. She had the necessary educational background and comparable sales experience.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
663 F. Supp. 11, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13728, 43 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 37,134, 43 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/equal-employment-opportunity-commission-v-mid-south-automobile-club-tnwd-1987.