Home/Ninth Circuit/Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Luce, Forward & Hamilton, & Scripps

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Luce, Forward & Hamilton, & Scripps

319 F.3d 1091
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 7, 2003
DocketNos. 00-57222, 01-55321; D.C. No. CV-00-01322-FMC
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 319 F.3d 1091 (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Luce, Forward & Hamilton, & Scripps) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Luce, Forward & Hamilton, & Scripps, 319 F.3d 1091 (9th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

[1092]*1092ORDER

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Luce, Forward & Hamilton, & Scripps, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Luce, Forward & Hamilton, & Scripps
319 F.3d 1091 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
319 F.3d 1091, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/equal-employment-opportunity-commission-v-luce-forward-hamilton-ca9-2003.