Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Lee's Log Cabin, Inc.
554 F.3d 1102, 21 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 957, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 2288
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided February 2, 2009·No. 06-3278·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinions
The slip opinion issued on October 6, 2008, is Amended to add the following language at the end of footnote 4 on page 12, 546 F.3d at 444:
We caution that nothing in this opinion should be read to suggest that the EEOC’s complaint failed to state a claim; we hold only that the district court was within its discretion to refuse to permit a change in the claim under the procedural circumstances of this case.
Otherwise, on consideration of the petition for panel rehearing and for rehearing en banc, a majority of judges have voted to deny rehearing.
It is therefore ordered that the petition for rehearing and for rehearing en banc is Denied.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Lee's Log Cabin, Inc., 554 F.3d 1102, 21 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 957, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 2288 (7th Cir. 2009).
554 F.3d 1102 (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Lee's Log Cabin, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Livingston v. City of Chicago
N.D. Illinois, 2024
Horgan v. Simmons
704 F. Supp. 2d 814 (N.D. Illinois, 2010)
Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Local No. 1 Welfare Trust v. Pekin Climate Control, Ltd.
669 F. Supp. 2d 924 (C.D. Illinois, 2009)
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Lee's Log Cabin, Inc.
554 F.3d 1102 (Seventh Circuit, 2009)