Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bass Pro Outdoor World, L.L.C.

865 F.3d 216, 2017 WL 1540853, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 7628, 101 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,798
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 28, 2017·No. 15-20078·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM:

The court having been polled at the request of one of its members, and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service and not disqualified not having voted in favor (Fed. R. App. P. 35 and 5th Cir. R. 35), the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED. In the en banc poll, seven judges voted in favor of rehearing [217]*217(Judges Jolly, Jones, Smith, Clement, Owen, Elrod, and Haynes), and seven judges voted against rehearing (Chief Judge Stewart and Judges Dennis, Prado, Southwick, Graves, Higginson, and Costa). Attached are (1) an opinion dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc authored by Judge Jolly, joined by Judges Jones, Smith, Clement, Owen, and Elrod; (2) a responding opinion authored by Judge Higginbotham, joined by Judges Southwick and Higginson; and (3) an opinion dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc authored by Judge Jones, joined by Judges Smith and Owen.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bass Pro Outdoor World, L.L.C., 865 F.3d 216, 2017 WL 1540853, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 7628, 101 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,798 (5th Cir. 2017).

865 F.3d 216 (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bass Pro Outdoor World, L.L.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Amy Hughes v. Andrew Kisela
Ninth Circuit, 2017
Hughes v. Kisela
862 F.3d 775 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)