Epstein v. Sirivejkul
397 N.E.2d 1326, 48 N.Y.2d 738, 422 N.Y.S.2d 658, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2385
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
In granting the motion to dismiss on the ground of forum non conveniens, the Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion as a matter of law or in exercising that discretion fail to take into account all the various factors entitled to consideration (Irrigation & Ind. Dev. Corp. v Indag S. A., 37 NY2d 522, 525).
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur in memorandum.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Epstein v. Sirivejkul, 397 N.E.2d 1326, 48 N.Y.2d 738, 422 N.Y.S.2d 658, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2385 (N.Y. 1979).
397 N.E.2d 1326 (Epstein v. Sirivejkul) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dawson v. Seenardine
232 A.D.2d 521 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Chesley v. Union Carbide Corp.
927 F.2d 60 (Second Circuit, 1991)
Chesley v. Union Carbide Corporation
927 F.2d 60 (Second Circuit, 1991)
Mokhiber v. Cohn
783 F.2d 26 (Second Circuit, 1986)
Nevader v. Deyo
111 A.D.2d 548 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Wienke v. Wienke
96 A.D.2d 1136 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Sullivan v. J.V. McNicholas Transfer Co.
93 A.D.2d 527 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Blais v. Deyo
92 A.D.2d 998 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Silversmith v. Kenosha Auto Transport
301 N.W.2d 725 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1981)
Ehrlich-Bober & Co. v. University of Houston
404 N.E.2d 726 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
Tomaszewski v. Cleveland
103 Misc. 2d 355 (New York Supreme Court, 1980)