Eppes's Administrators v. Smith

4 Munf. 466, 18 Va. 466, 1815 Va. LEXIS 37
Supreme Court of Virginia·Decided October 30, 1815·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Judge Roane

delivered the court’s opinion, “ that the said judgment is erroneous in this; that the first two pleas conclude to the country, which might have been cured by the verdict, but that is also erroneous in so much thereof as decides on the first plea of no such record,” which, if properly pleaded, ought to have been decided by the court; also in not finding, on the plea of “wo assets,” the quantum of assets which came to the hands of the intestate of the plaintiffs ; and further, in not finding what [468] assets of Henry Anderson, or of Freeman Eppes came to the hands of the plaintiffs in error. The demurrer to the fourth plea, the court is of opinion, was rightfully sustained, by the Superior Court; the said plaintiffs being estopped to plead such plea by the judgment against their intestate Freeman Efifies.”

Judgment reversed ; verdict set aside; and caus'e remanded to the Superior Court of Law to be farther proceeded in,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eppes's Administrators v. Smith, 4 Munf. 466, 18 Va. 466, 1815 Va. LEXIS 37 (Va. 1815).

4 Munf. 466 (Eppes's Administrators v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis' Adm'rs v. Mead
13 Gratt. 118 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1856)
Stewart v. Treasurer
4 Ohio 88 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1829)
Booth's executors v. Armstrong
2 Va. 301 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1796)