Booth's executors v. Armstrong

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Booth's executors v. Armstrong

2 Va. 301

DecidedOctober 15, 1796

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Va. 301 (Booth's executors v. Armstrong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Booth's executors v. Armstrong, 2 Va. 301 (Va. Ct. App. 1796).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court

was of opinion, that the verdict ought to be set aside “ as being uncertain and insufficient in not finding on the issue, that the appellant had goods and chattels, which were of the decedent at the time of his death, in his hands to be administered, more than sufficient to satisfy the judgments in the appellant’s plea set forth, whereof he could have satisfied the appellee’s demand, or the value of the said goods and chattels, if not sufficient to satisfy the said demand.”

Judgment reversed, verdict set aside, and the cause remanded.(¹)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court

was of opinion, that the verdict ought to be set aside “ as being uncertain and insufficient in not finding on the issue, that the appellant had goods and chattels, which were of the decedent at the time of his death, in his hands to be administered, more than sufficient to satisfy the judgments in the appellant’s plea set forth, whereof he could have satisfied the appellee’s demand, or the value of the said goods and chattels, if not sufficient to satisfy the said demand.”

Judgment reversed, verdict set aside, and the cause remanded.(¹)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Va. 301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/booths-executors-v-armstrong-vactapp-1796.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack