Enterprise Coal Co. v. Phillips

84 F.2d 565, 18 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 173, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4542
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedJune 15, 1936
DocketNo. 6006
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 84 F.2d 565 (Enterprise Coal Co. v. Phillips) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Enterprise Coal Co. v. Phillips, 84 F.2d 565, 18 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 173, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4542 (3d Cir. 1936).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In the court below the Enterprise Coal Company brought suit against the collector of internal revenue to recover taxes which it alleged were illegally collected from it. By written stipulation, trial by jury was waived and the case tried by the judge, who found for the collector, and from a [566]*566judgment entered against the defendant this appeal was taken.

As we view the case before the trial judge, the issues involved questions of fact. In that regard the trial judge summarized them as follows: “The taxpayer sought to deduct from its income for the year 1923 the following items: Operating expenses $115,887.65; Loss on abandonment $101,157.47; Depletion of culm bank $93,257.10. The disallowance of these deductions by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue resulted in the tax in question and the Commissioner’s action is made the basis of this suit.” And added: “The plaintiff bases its case upon the testimony of its two witnesses, Heinbokel and Jennings, and some documentary evidence. The issues involved are largely questions of fact depending upon this evidence.”

Under the principles stated by the Supreme Court in Eastman Kodak Co. v. Gray, 292 U.S. 332, 54 S.Ct. 722, 78 L.Ed. 1291, when trial by jury is waived, this court has no jurisdiction to review findings of fact where there was evidence from which such findings of fact could be made. Regarding the case as simply involving fact findings by the trial tribunal which are conclusive upon this court, the judgment below is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Geoghegan & Mathis, Inc. v. Commissioner
55 T.C. 672 (U.S. Tax Court, 1971)
Kennecott Copper Corporation v. The United States
347 F.2d 275 (Court of Claims, 1965)
United States Gypsum Co. v. United States
206 F. Supp. 744 (N.D. Illinois, 1962)
Alsted Coal Co. v. Yoke
200 F.2d 766 (Fourth Circuit, 1952)
Alstead Coal Co. v. Yoke
104 F. Supp. 606 (N.D. West Virginia, 1952)
Oliver v. Bell
103 F.2d 760 (Third Circuit, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 F.2d 565, 18 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 173, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4542, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/enterprise-coal-co-v-phillips-ca3-1936.