Enron Oil Trading & Transportation Co. v. United States

17 Ct. Int'l Trade 589

United States Court of International Trade·Decided June 16, 1993·No. Court No. 87-09-00935·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Musgrave, Judge:

Upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion To Alter Or Amend Judgment pursuant to Rule 59(e), and plaintiffs response thereto, it is hereby

[590]*590Ordered that the third and final paragraph of the Judgment of this Court of March 29, 1993 is amended nunc pro tunc, to read:

“Ordered, adjudged and decreed that the Customs Service shall refund all duties paid on Consumption Entry No. 86-122596-9, with interest as provided by law, no later than July 30, 1993.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Musgrave, Judge:

Upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion To Alter Or Amend Judgment pursuant to Rule 59(e), and plaintiffs response thereto, it is hereby

[590]*590Ordered that the third and final paragraph of the Judgment of this Court of March 29, 1993 is amended nunc pro tunc, to read:

“Ordered, adjudged and decreed that the Customs Service shall refund all duties paid on Consumption Entry No. 86-122596-9, with interest as provided by law, no later than July 30, 1993.”

Enron Oil Trading & Transportation Co. v. United States, 17 Ct. Int'l Trade 589 (cit 1993).

Pincite

17 Ct. Int'l Trade 589 (Enron Oil Trading & Transportation Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.