Enright v. Acton

298 F. App'x 681
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 5, 2008·No. No. 07-35767·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Montana state prisoner Donna June En-right appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing her 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as untimely. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

The district court determined that En-right was not entitled to equitable tolling, but granted a certificate of appealability on the issue. In her opening brief, En-right fails to address, and therefore has waived any challenge to, the district court’s dismissal of her habeas petition as untimely. See United States v. Vought, 69 F.3d 1498, 1501 (9th Cir.1995).

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Enright v. Acton, 298 F. App'x 681 (9th Cir. 2008).

298 F. App'x 681 (Enright v. Acton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related