Ennis v. Slade

179 A.D.2d 558
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 28, 1992·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[559] Respondent, pursuant to Public Officers Law § 89 (3) (Freedom of Information Law, Public Officers Law art 6), made a diligent search and could not locate the documents described by petitioner, relating to an alleged narcotics investigation conducted by Brooklyn North Narcotics District and misidentified by petitioner as “Buy Operation 456, B-9-9127, UF 61”. However, even if said documents did exist, such would be exempt from disclosure pursuant to Public Officers Law § 87 (2) (e) (iii), (iv) and (g). Records of a “Buy operation” are compiled for law enforcement purposes and, if disclosed, would reveal confidential sources and information, as well as expert criminal investigative techniques. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Ellerin, Ross and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ennis v. Slade, 179 A.D.2d 558 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

179 A.D.2d 558 (Ennis v. Slade) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sanders v. Bratton
278 A.D.2d 10 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)