Ennis v. Slade

179 A.D.2d 558
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 28, 1992
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 179 A.D.2d 558 (Ennis v. Slade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ennis v. Slade, 179 A.D.2d 558 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

[559]*559Respondent, pursuant to Public Officers Law § 89 (3) (Freedom of Information Law, Public Officers Law art 6), made a diligent search and could not locate the documents described by petitioner, relating to an alleged narcotics investigation conducted by Brooklyn North Narcotics District and misidentified by petitioner as “Buy Operation 456, B-9-9127, UF 61”. However, even if said documents did exist, such would be exempt from disclosure pursuant to Public Officers Law § 87 (2) (e) (iii), (iv) and (g). Records of a “Buy operation” are compiled for law enforcement purposes and, if disclosed, would reveal confidential sources and information, as well as expert criminal investigative techniques. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Ellerin, Ross and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sanders v. Bratton
278 A.D.2d 10 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
179 A.D.2d 558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ennis-v-slade-nyappdiv-1992.