Enmund v. Florida
455 U.S. 937, 102 S. Ct. 1425, 71 L. Ed. 2d 647, 50 U.S.L.W. 3668, 1982 U.S. LEXIS 811
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Enmund v. Florida. Read the opinion of the Court — 458 U.S. 782 →
Opinion
Sup. Ct. Fla. [Certiorari granted, 454 U. S. 939.] Motion of George R. Georgieff to permit Lawrence A. Kaden, Esquire, to present oral argument pro hac vice granted. Motion of William C. McLain to permit James S. Liebman, Esquire, to present oral argument pro hac vice granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Enmund v. Florida, 455 U.S. 937, 102 S. Ct. 1425, 71 L. Ed. 2d 647, 50 U.S.L.W. 3668, 1982 U.S. LEXIS 811 (1982).
455 U.S. 937 (Enmund v. Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.