English v. Wilmerding Borough School District

30 A. 506, 165 Pa. 21, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 919
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 12, 1894·No. Appeal, No. 196·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Although this case appears to be one of much hardship to the defendant, we do not see how we can grant any relief. The rule so carefully and thoroughly considered and enforced in Hostetter v. City of Pittsburg, 107 Pa. 419, is directly applicable to the case and controls it. That rule is too useful and valuable to our system of jurisprudence to be frittered away in particular cases in order that special hardships may be pre[24]*24vented. The question of payments was clearly within the cog-1 nizance of the arbitrator, and by the express terms of the contract both parties were conclusively bound by his decision.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

English v. Wilmerding Borough School District, 30 A. 506, 165 Pa. 21, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 919 (Pa. 1894).

30 A. 506 (English v. Wilmerding Borough School District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Patriotic Order Sons of America Hall Ass'n v. Hartford Fire Insurance
157 A. 259 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1931)
Commonwealth v. Eastern Paving Co.
8 Pa. D. & C. 357 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1926)
Kann v. Bennett
82 A. 1111 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1912)
Klingensmith v. West Leechburg Steel & Tin Plate Co.
17 Pa. Super. 210 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1901)