Engel v. Unknown Correctional Officers

District Court, E.D. Missouri·Decided June 18, 2021·No. 4:20-cv-01899·Unknown

Opinion

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

JOSEPH MICHAEL DEVON ENGEL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 4:20-CV-1899-MTS ) UNKNOWN CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS, ) et al., ) ) Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on plaintiff Joseph Michael Devon Engel’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Doc. [6]. During the proceedings in this United States District Court, plaintiff proceeded pro se and in forma pauperis. However, when the Court dismissed this action on May 13, 2021, the Court certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith, see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), and it is not apparent that plaintiff now seeks appellate review of any issue that is not frivolous. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962). Further, plaintiff has repeatedly filed meritless lawsuits in this Court, to the point his litigation practices have risen to the level of abuse of the judicial process. The Court therefore finds plaintiff may not proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. The instant motion will be denied. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, Doc. [6], is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file any future documents or pleadings in connection with his appeal directly with the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Dated this 18th day of June, 2021. he Le UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Engel v. Unknown Correctional Officers, (E.D. Mo. 2021).

Engel v. Unknown Correctional Officers (Engel v. Unknown Correctional Officers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)