Engel v. Ripley County
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION
JOSEPH MICHAEL DEVON ENGEL, ) o/b/o DYLAN JOSEPH GRAHAM ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 1:20-cv-00252 SRC ) RIPLEY COUNTY, et al., ) ) Defendants. )
Memorandum and Order This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Plaintiff has accumulated more than three “strikes” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g),1 and he does not qualify for the imminent danger exception. Further, plaintiff has engaged in the practice of repeatedly filing meritless lawsuits in this Court. Since September 2020, plaintiff has filed over one-hundred-thirty (130) lawsuits in this Court, which is an abuse of the judicial process. As of this date, most of his lawsuits have been dismissed as frivolous, malicious and/or for failure to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Finally, it is apparent that plaintiff now seeks appellate review of an issue that is frivolous. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962). As a result, for the above stated reasons, the Court finds that an appeal of this matter may not be taken in good faith and plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal will be denied. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
1See Engel v. Governor of Missouri, et al., No. 1:20-cv-217 HEA (E.D. Mo. Dec. 15, 2020); Engel v. United States of America, et al., No. 4:20-cv-1742 MTS (E.D. Mo. Dec. 18, 2020); Engel v. Missouri Courts, et al., No. 4:20-cv-1258 SPM (E.D. Mo. Dec. 21, 2020). Accordingly, the Court denies [6] plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. The Court further orders that within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, plaintiff shall pay to this Court the full $505.00 filing fee for filing an appeal. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance payable to “Clerk, United States District Court,” and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison identification number; (3) the case number; and (4) that the remittance is for the appeal of the instant action. The Court finally orders that plaintiff shall file any future documents or pleadings in connection with his appeal directly with the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
So Ordered this 24th day of August 2021.
STEPHEN R. CLARK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Engel v. Ripley County (Engel v. Ripley County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.