Engel v. Gildner

Michigan Supreme Court

Engel v. Gildner

254 Mich. 361

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Engel v. Gildner. Read the opinion of the Court — 248 Mich. 95 →

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided June 1, 1931·No. Docket No. 128, Calendar No. 35,598·Published

Opinion

Potter, J.

This case was once before this court and it was held defendants were entitled to a prescriptive easement in the driveway in question to a point to be determined by the circuit judge. Engel v. Gildner, 248 Mich. 95. The circuit judge, after the case was remanded, and after hearing the testimony adduced by the respective parties, made a final decree which we think is supported by the evidence, and which is affirmed, with costs.

Butzel, C. J., and Wiest, Clark, McDonald, Sharpe, North, and Fead, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Potter, J.

This case was once before this court and it was held defendants were entitled to a prescriptive easement in the driveway in question to a point to be determined by the circuit judge. Engel v. Gildner, 248 Mich. 95. The circuit judge, after the case was remanded, and after hearing the testimony adduced by the respective parties, made a final decree which we think is supported by the evidence, and which is affirmed, with costs.

Butzel, C. J., and Wiest, Clark, McDonald, Sharpe, North, and Fead, JJ., concurred.

Engel v. Gildner, 254 Mich. 361 (Mich. 1931).

Pincite

254 Mich. 361 (Engel v. Gildner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related