Enderud v. George Jackson Mental Health Center
This text of 3 F. App'x 580 (Enderud v. George Jackson Mental Health Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Tamara Stone-Enderud appeals the district court’s1 judgment in favor of defen[581]*581dant following a bench trial in her employment discrimination action. After careful consideration of the arguments in StoneEnderud’s brief, we conclude that the district court’s judgment should be affirmed. Stone-Enderud fails to direct us to anything in the record which would show that the district court erred in entering judgment against her after finding that her former employer did not engage in intentional discrimination against her based on her religion.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 F. App'x 580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/enderud-v-george-jackson-mental-health-center-ca8-2001.