Emrit v. Holland
This text of 697 F. App'x 15 (Emrit v. Holland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
JUDGMENT
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed January 27, 2017, be affirmed. Appellant has not shown any error in the dismissal of his case as time-barred. See D.C. Code § 12-301 (establishing three-year limitations period for contract claims, one-year limitations period for various tort claims, and three-year residual limitations period).
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
697 F. App'x 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emrit-v-holland-cadc-2017.