Emray Realty Corp. v. Lloyd

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Emray Realty Corp. v. Lloyd

5 Misc. 2d 938, 158 N.Y.S.2d 852, 1956 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1288

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedDecember 13, 1956

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 5 Misc. 2d 938 (Emray Realty Corp. v. Lloyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Emray Realty Corp. v. Lloyd, 5 Misc. 2d 938, 158 N.Y.S.2d 852, 1956 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1288 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Where a final order has been granted and eviction warrant has been issued, after trial in a summary proceeding for nonpayment of rent, the Municipal Court has no jurisdiction to set aside the final order and warrant. (Hanover Bank v. De Koenigsberg, 207 Misc. 1088, affd. no opinion 285 App. Div. 928; Wassel v. Reimer, 119 N. Y. S. 2d 33; Hendricks v. Ergis, 66 N. Y. S. 2d 349). The issuance of the warrant terminated the relationship of landlord and tenant and the Municipal Court loses jurisdiction of the parties where the final order and warrant has been issued after a trial (16-18 East 30th St. Realty Corp. v. Feller, 191 N. Y. S. 332; Schulte, Inc., v. Cross, 146 Misc. 763; Christatos v. United Cigar Stores Co., 144 Misc. 322; Mann v. Munch Brewery, 225 N. Y. 189, 194; Hewen Co. v. Thibaut Realty Co., 154 Misc. 687, 698).

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and final order and warrant for landlord reinstated, with costs.

Aueelio and Tilzeb, JJ., concur; Hofstadteb, J., dissents.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Where a final order has been granted and eviction warrant has been issued, after trial in a summary proceeding for nonpayment of rent, the Municipal Court has no jurisdiction to set aside the final order and warrant. (Hanover Bank v. De Koenigsberg, 207 Misc. 1088, affd. no opinion 285 App. Div. 928; Wassel v. Reimer, 119 N. Y. S. 2d 33; Hendricks v. Ergis, 66 N. Y. S. 2d 349). The issuance of the warrant terminated the relationship of landlord and tenant and the Municipal Court loses jurisdiction of the parties where the final order and warrant has been issued after a trial (16-18 East 30th St. Realty Corp. v. Feller, 191 N. Y. S. 332; Schulte, Inc., v. Cross, 146 Misc. 763; Christatos v. United Cigar Stores Co., 144 Misc. 322; Mann v. Munch Brewery, 225 N. Y. 189, 194; Hewen Co. v. Thibaut Realty Co., 154 Misc. 687, 698).

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and final order and warrant for landlord reinstated, with costs.

Aueelio and Tilzeb, JJ., concur; Hofstadteb, J., dissents.

Order reversed, etc.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Misc. 2d 938, 158 N.Y.S.2d 852, 1956 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emray-realty-corp-v-lloyd-nyappterm-1956.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack