Home/Fifth Circuit/Employers Casualty Company v. August E. Dupaquier

Employers Casualty Company v. August E. Dupaquier

338 F.2d 336, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 3828
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 20, 1964
Docket21232
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 338 F.2d 336 (Employers Casualty Company v. August E. Dupaquier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Employers Casualty Company v. August E. Dupaquier, 338 F.2d 336, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 3828 (5th Cir. 1964).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Such inconsistencies as existed between the answer to the special interrogatory and the jury’s general verdict were apparent in ample time for appellant to have moved for resubmission to the jury. Upon failure of the party to move the Court to resubmit the case, it was not error for the Court to reconcile the answer with the verdict as it did. See Jefferson v. Taiyo Katun, 5 Cir. 1962, 310 F.2d 582. 5 Moore, Fed. Prac. ¶ 49.04 at p. 2211.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Los Angeles Nut House v. Holiday Hardware Corp.
825 F.2d 1351 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)
Los Angeles Nut House v. Holiday Hardware Corp., a Hawaiian Corporation, Dba Handy Man Stores, Holiday Exotic Sea Foods, Gene Hill and William P. Wrixon, Holiday Hardware Corp., Third-Party Plaintiff/appellee/cross-Appellant v. Theo H. Davies & Co., Ltd., Dba Theo H. Davis & Co., Ltd., Lloyds Agency Department, Third Party Defendants/appellants/cross-Appellees. Los Angeles Nut House v. Holiday Hardware Corp., Holiday Hardware Corp. And William P. Wrixon, Defendants/third-Party v. Theo H. Davies & Co., Ltd., Dba Theo H. Davis & Co., Ltd., Lloyds Agency Department, Defendants/third-Party
825 F.2d 1351 (Third Circuit, 1987)
Bill Mercer v. Long Mfg. N. C., Inc.
671 F.2d 946 (Fifth Circuit, 1982)
McCue v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
358 N.E.2d 799 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1976)
Seven Provinces Insurance v. Commerce & Industry Insurance
65 F.R.D. 674 (W.D. Missouri, 1975)
Mrs. Harvey Stancill v. McKenzie Tank Lines, Inc., and Carriers Insurance Company
497 F.2d 529 (Fifth Circuit, 1974)
Donald E. Ludwig v. Marion Laboratories, Inc., a Corporation
465 F.2d 114 (Eighth Circuit, 1972)
City of Homer v. Land's End Marine
459 P.2d 475 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1969)
Tennessee Consolidated Coal Company and Grundy Coal Company v. United Mine Workers of America
416 F.2d 1192 (Sixth Circuit, 1969)
Allen v. D'Ercole Construction Co.
244 A.2d 864 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1968)
Thomas D. Cundiff v. Virginia Lee Washburn
393 F.2d 505 (Seventh Circuit, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
338 F.2d 336, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 3828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/employers-casualty-company-v-august-e-dupaquier-ca5-1964.