Empire Golf Management, LLC v. Olivieri

18 A.D.3d 334, 794 N.Y.S.2d 649, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5459
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 19, 2005·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold B. Beeler, J.), entered February 23, 2004, which granted petitioner losing proposer’s application pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) for access to the winning proposals submitted to respondent Department of Parks and Recreation for concessions to run City-owned golf courses, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The winning proposals should be disclosed since the submis[335]*335sion process had ended, the winning proposals were identified, and contract negotiations were well underway. Given these circumstances, the winning proposals could no longer be considered “competitively sensitive” and therefore exempt from FOIL disclosure under Public Officers Law § 87 (2) (c) (see Matter of Cross-Sound Ferry Servs. v Department of Transp., 219 AD2d 346, 349 [1995]). Concur—Saxe, J.P., Marlow, Sullivan, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Empire Golf Management, LLC v. Olivieri, 18 A.D.3d 334, 794 N.Y.S.2d 649, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5459 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

18 A.D.3d 334 (Empire Golf Management, LLC v. Olivieri) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Acme Bus Corp. v. County of Suffolk
136 A.D.3d 896 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Global TelLink v. State of New York Department of Correctional Services
68 A.D.3d 1599 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Verizon New York, Inc. v. Bradbury
10 Misc. 3d 785 (New York Supreme Court, 2005)