Emery v. Hobson
63 Me. 32
Opinion
Rescript.
Hobson was bound to keep funds in the bank. He had none after July 6, 1871. Not having any funds, no presentment was essential, and he suffered no injury from, the delay in presentment.
Therefore the testimony outside of the check, as to the purpose of the parties relative to it, was immaterial, even if it was .improperly admitted. Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Emery v. Hobson, 63 Me. 32 (Me. 1873).
63 Me. 32 (Emery v. Hobson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fritz v. Kennedy
93 N.W. 603 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1903)
Selby v. McCullough
26 Mo. App. 66 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1887)
Wear v. Lee
26 Mo. App. 99 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1887)