Emery v. Hobson
63 Me. 32
This text of 63 Me. 32 (Emery v. Hobson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Emery v. Hobson, 63 Me. 32 (Me. 1873).
Opinion
Rescript.
Hobson was bound to keep funds in the bank. He had none after July 6, 1871. Not having any funds, no presentment was essential, and he suffered no injury from, the delay in presentment.
Therefore the testimony outside of the check, as to the purpose of the parties relative to it, was immaterial, even if it was .improperly admitted. Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Fritz v. Kennedy
93 N.W. 603 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1903)
Selby v. McCullough
26 Mo. App. 66 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1887)
Wear v. Lee
26 Mo. App. 99 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1887)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
63 Me. 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emery-v-hobson-me-1873.