Emery Bird Thayer Dry Goods Co. v. Williams

302 U.S. 651, 58 S. Ct. 269
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 22, 1937·No. No. 268; No. 269·Published

Opinion

[651] On certificate from the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

Messrs. Armwell L. Cooper and Frederick H. Wood for Emery Bird Thayer Dry Goods Co. et al., and Messrs. Henry M. Channing and Barton Cornean for Moses Williams et al.

Per Curiam:

The motion to bring up the entire record and cause is denied. Upon examination of the certificate, the certificate is dismissed. Jewell v. Knight, 123 U. S. 426, 433; Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 215 U. S. 216, 221; Biddle v. Luvisch, 266 U. S. 173; Smith v. Ajax Pipe Line Co., 298 U. S. 641; Dixie Terminal Co. v. United States, 298 U. S. 645.

Reported below: 15 F. Supp. 938.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Emery Bird Thayer Dry Goods Co. v. Williams, 302 U.S. 651, 58 S. Ct. 269 (1937).

302 U.S. 651 (Emery Bird Thayer Dry Goods Co. v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jewell v. Knight
123 U.S. 426 (Supreme Court, 1887)
Biddle v. Luvisch
266 U.S. 173 (Supreme Court, 1924)
Emery Bird Thayer Dry Goods Co. v. Williams
15 F. Supp. 938 (W.D. Missouri, 1936)
Smith v. Ajax Pipe Line Co.
298 U.S. 641 (Supreme Court, 1936)
Dixie Terminal Co. v. United States
298 U.S. 645 (Supreme Court, 1936)