Emery Bird Thayer Dry Goods Co. v. Williams

302 U.S. 651, 58 S. Ct. 269
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 22, 1937
DocketNo. 268; No. 269
StatusPublished

This text of 302 U.S. 651 (Emery Bird Thayer Dry Goods Co. v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Emery Bird Thayer Dry Goods Co. v. Williams, 302 U.S. 651, 58 S. Ct. 269 (1937).

Opinion

[651]*651On certificate from the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

Messrs. Armwell L. Cooper and Frederick H. Wood for Emery Bird Thayer Dry Goods Co. et al., and Messrs. Henry M. Channing and Barton Cornean for Moses Williams et al.

Per Curiam:

The motion to bring up the entire record and cause is denied. Upon examination of the certificate, the certificate is dismissed. Jewell v. Knight, 123 U. S. 426, 433; Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 215 U. S. 216, 221; Biddle v. Luvisch, 266 U. S. 173; Smith v. Ajax Pipe Line Co., 298 U. S. 641; Dixie Terminal Co. v. United States, 298 U. S. 645.

Reported below: 15 F. Supp. 938.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jewell v. Knight
123 U.S. 426 (Supreme Court, 1887)
Biddle v. Luvisch
266 U.S. 173 (Supreme Court, 1924)
Emery Bird Thayer Dry Goods Co. v. Williams
15 F. Supp. 938 (W.D. Missouri, 1936)
Smith v. Ajax Pipe Line Co.
298 U.S. 641 (Supreme Court, 1936)
Dixie Terminal Co. v. United States
298 U.S. 645 (Supreme Court, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
302 U.S. 651, 58 S. Ct. 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emery-bird-thayer-dry-goods-co-v-williams-scotus-1937.