Dixie Terminal Co. v. United States

298 U.S. 645, 56 S. Ct. 953, 80 L. Ed. 1376, 1936 U.S. LEXIS 749
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 1, 1936·No. No. 967·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss the certificate is granted and the certificate is dismissed. Jewell v. Knight, 123 U. S. 426, 433; Cross v. Evans, 167 U. S. 60, 63; B. & O. R. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Comm’n, 215. U. S. 216, 221; United States v. Mayer, 235 U. S. 55, 66; Larabee Flour Mills Co. v. First National Bank of Dublin, 290 U. S. 594; Mantle Lamp Co. v. Aluminum Products Co., 297 U. S. 638; Smith, Collector v. Ajax Pipe Line Co., ante, p. 641. Solicitor General Reed for the United States in support of the motion. Messrs. Charles P. Taft and Robert A. Taft for Dixie Terminal Co.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dixie Terminal Co. v. United States, 298 U.S. 645, 56 S. Ct. 953, 80 L. Ed. 1376, 1936 U.S. LEXIS 749 (1936).

298 U.S. 645 (Dixie Terminal Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Logan v. Commonwealth
214 S.W.2d 279 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1948)
Vandenbark v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co.
110 F.2d 310 (Sixth Circuit, 1940)
Emery Bird Thayer Dry Goods Co. v. Williams
302 U.S. 651 (Supreme Court, 1937)
Montjoy v. Commonwealth
109 S.W.2d 1209 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1937)