EMBOSSING PRINTERS, INC. v. Department of Treasury

711 N.W.2d 339, 474 Mich. 1086
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 20, 2006
Docket129605
StatusPublished

This text of 711 N.W.2d 339 (EMBOSSING PRINTERS, INC. v. Department of Treasury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
EMBOSSING PRINTERS, INC. v. Department of Treasury, 711 N.W.2d 339, 474 Mich. 1086 (Mich. 2006).

Opinion

711 N.W.2d 339 (2006)
474 Mich. 1086

EMBOSSING PRINTERS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 129605, COA No. 252894.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

March 22, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 12, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. To the extent that the Court of Appeals opinion rejects the "incidental to service" test adopted by this Court in Catalina Marketing v. Dep't of Treasury, 470 Mich. 13, 678 N.W.2d 619 (2004), it is VACATED.

CAVANAGH, J., would deny leave to appeal without further statement found in the majority's order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Catalina Marketing Sales Corp. v. Department of Treasury
678 N.W.2d 619 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
711 N.W.2d 339, 474 Mich. 1086, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/embossing-printers-inc-v-department-of-treasury-mich-2006.