Elmore v. State
This text of 600 So. 2d 569 (Elmore v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jeffrey Dewayne Elmore has appealed from a sentence imposed following his plea of nolo contendere to burglary of a structure. The State of Florida has moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, citing section 924.06, Florida Statutes (1989); Ford v. State, 575 So.2d 1335 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); and Kearney v. State, 579 So.2d 410 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).
We deny the motion to dismiss, Pyle v. State, 596 So.2d 744 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), and affirm. However, we direct that the special condition of probation requiring El-more to pay $1.00 monthly to First Step of Bay Co., Inc. be stricken, based on the trial court’s failure to pronounce that condition orally at sentencing. See, e.g., Shaddix v. State, 599 So.2d 269 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
600 So. 2d 569, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7385, 1992 WL 150978, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elmore-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.