Cooper v. State
This text of 602 So. 2d 999 (Cooper v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Sharon Cooper has appealed from a sentence imposed following her plea of nolo contendere to grand theft, and cashing or depositing an item with intent to defraud. The State of Florida has moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, citing section 924.-06, Florida Statutes (1989), Ford v. State, 575 So.2d 1335 (Fla. 1st DCA1991), and Kearney v. State, 579 So.2d 410 (Fla. 1st DCA1991).
We deny the motion to dismiss, Pyle v. State, 596 So.2d 744 (Fla. 1st DCA1992), and affirm. However, we direct that the special condition of probation requiring Cooper to pay $1.00 monthly to First Step of Bay Co., Inc. be stricken, based on the trial court’s failure to pronounce that condition orally at sentencing. See Brown v. State, 600 So.2d 569 (Fla. 1st DCA1992) and Elmore v. State, 600 So.2d 569 (Fla. 1st DCA1992).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
602 So. 2d 999, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9214, 1992 WL 197807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooper-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.