Ellis v. State

280 S.W.3d 795, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 522, 2009 WL 1057982
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 21, 2009·No. ED 91725·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Marcus Ellis appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Moss v. State, 10 S.W.3d 508, 511 (Mo.banc 2000). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ellis v. State, 280 S.W.3d 795, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 522, 2009 WL 1057982 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

280 S.W.3d 795 (Ellis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Johnson
280 S.W.3d 795 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)