Ellis v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Ellis v. State

244 S.W.3d 197, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 65, 2008 WL 123924

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ellis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 522 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 15, 2008·No. ED 89563·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Larry D. Ellis appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 29.15 postcon-viction relief motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. White v. State, 57 S.W.3d 341, 343 (Mo.App. E.D.2001). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We *198 affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Larry D. Ellis appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 29.15 postcon-viction relief motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. White v. State, 57 S.W.3d 341, 343 (Mo.App. E.D.2001). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We *198 affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Ellis v. State, 244 S.W.3d 197, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 65, 2008 WL 123924 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

244 S.W.3d 197 (Ellis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related