Ellis v. State
938 So. 2d 577, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 15467, 2006 WL 2683362
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ellis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 869 So. 2d 52 →
Opinion
Appellant, Brent T. Ellis, raises two issues on appeal: (1) whether the trial court erred in denying his motion for disqualification of the trial judge, and (2) whether he received ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm the trial court’s denial of Ellis’s disqualification motion. However, we decline to rule on his ineffective assistance of counsel claim on direct appeal. This holding is without prejudice to raising [578]*578the ineffective assistance of counsel claim in a Rule 3.850 post-conviction motion.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ellis v. State, 938 So. 2d 577, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 15467, 2006 WL 2683362 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
938 So. 2d 577 (Ellis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.