Ellis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ellis v. State

925 So. 2d 454, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5366, 2006 WL 931921

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 12, 2006

DocketNo. 3D04-3072

StatusPublished

This text of 925 So. 2d 454 (Ellis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ellis v. State, 925 So. 2d 454, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5366, 2006 WL 931921 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Roderick Ellis has appealed his conviction for second degree murder with a [455]*455deadly weapon. After giving the police interrogator four or five (inconsistent) explanations as to why he shot and killed Tommy Collins (“Sam”), his final story was one of self-defense.

We have reviewed the record and conclude that any errors the trial court may have made are harmless error beyond a reasonable doubt.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Roderick Ellis has appealed his conviction for second degree murder with a [455]*455deadly weapon. After giving the police interrogator four or five (inconsistent) explanations as to why he shot and killed Tommy Collins (“Sam”), his final story was one of self-defense.

We have reviewed the record and conclude that any errors the trial court may have made are harmless error beyond a reasonable doubt.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

925 So. 2d 454, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5366, 2006 WL 931921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellis-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.