Ellis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ellis v. State

925 So. 2d 454, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5366, 2006 WL 931921

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 12, 2006·No. No. 3D04-3072·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Roderick Ellis has appealed his conviction for second degree murder with a [455] deadly weapon. After giving the police interrogator four or five (inconsistent) explanations as to why he shot and killed Tommy Collins (“Sam”), his final story was one of self-defense.

We have reviewed the record and conclude that any errors the trial court may have made are harmless error beyond a reasonable doubt.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Roderick Ellis has appealed his conviction for second degree murder with a [455] deadly weapon. After giving the police interrogator four or five (inconsistent) explanations as to why he shot and killed Tommy Collins (“Sam”), his final story was one of self-defense.

We have reviewed the record and conclude that any errors the trial court may have made are harmless error beyond a reasonable doubt.

Affirmed.

Ellis v. State, 925 So. 2d 454, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5366, 2006 WL 931921 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

925 So. 2d 454 (Ellis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.