Ellis v. Sealey

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided July 6, 2021·No. 1:21-cv-04398·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK WILLIAM ELLIS, JR., Plaintiff, -against- 21-CV-4398 (LTS) RHONDA P. SEALEY; CAROL ANN ORDER JORDAN, Defendants. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: Plaintiff brings this action appearing pro se and proceeding in forma pauperis (“IFP”). By order dated June 15, 2021, the Court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted, under the doctrine of absolute judicial immunity, and as frivolous, and entered judgment. (ECF 6, 7.) On June 28, 2021, the Court received from Plaintiff a new complaint form that includes the caption and docket number of this action, and in which Plaintiff asserts substantially similar claims as those asserted in the original complaint.1 (See ECF 8.) The Court construes Plaintiff’s submission as an amended complaint, and dismisses it for the reasons

stated in its June 15, 2021 order of dismissal.2 This case is closed. The Court will only accept for filing documents that are directed to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. If Plaintiff continues to file documents in this closed action, the Court will direct Plaintiff to show cause why Plaintiff should not be barred from filing further documents in this action.

1 Plaintiff also filed a new IFP application. (ECF 9.) 2 The Court is obliged to construe pro se pleadings liberally, Harris v. Mills, 572 F.3d 66, 72 (2d Cir. 2009), and interpret them to raise the “strongest [claims] that they suggest,” Triestman v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 470 F.3d 471, 474 (2d Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted) (emphasis in original). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See

Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. Dated: July 6, 2021 New York, New York

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ellis v. Sealey, (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Ellis v. Sealey (Ellis v. Sealey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)
Harris v. Mills
572 F.3d 66 (Second Circuit, 2009)