Ellis v. Borzilleri

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ellis v. Borzilleri

41 A.D.3d 1172, 836 N.Y.S.2d 464

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 8, 2007

DocketAppeal No. 2

StatusPublished

This text of 41 A.D.3d 1172 (Ellis v. Borzilleri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ellis v. Borzilleri, 41 A.D.3d 1172, 836 N.Y.S.2d 464 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John A. Michalek, J.), entered July 25, 2006 in a personal injury action. The order, among other things, denied plaintiffs’ motion for an order setting aside the verdict with respect to defendants Jason M. Hazard and Ford Motor Credit Company, granting judgment as a matter of law against them and directing the apportionment of liability at the trial on damages.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal and cross appeal be and the same hereby are unanimously dismissed without costs (see Smith v Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn & Queens, 155 AD2d 435 [1989]; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1], [2]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Hurlbutt, Green and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John A. Michalek, J.), entered July 25, 2006 in a personal injury action. The order, among other things, denied plaintiffs’ motion for an order setting aside the verdict with respect to defendants Jason M. Hazard and Ford Motor Credit Company, granting judgment as a matter of law against them and directing the apportionment of liability at the trial on damages.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal and cross appeal be and the same hereby are unanimously dismissed without costs (see Smith v Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn & Queens, 155 AD2d 435 [1989]; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1], [2]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Hurlbutt, Green and Pine, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 A.D.3d 1172, 836 N.Y.S.2d 464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellis-v-borzilleri-nyappdiv-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack